Robert Faurisson: “The Holocaust” is a historical lie.
At the very height of the Zionist massacre of which Gaza Palestinians are now the victims, Professor Robert Faurisson states once more that there was never any genocide of the Jews during the Second World War and that the Nazis, under Hitler’s rule, never perpetrated what today is called “the Holocaust”. Since he began expressing his convictions publicly the Jewish lobby has never ceased attacking and persecuting him for his historical research and his opinions. I first met him just over two years ago at the international conference on “the Holocaust” held in Tehran. Since then we’ve met and corresponded a number of times. With Israel’s war against Gaza, Professor Faurisson has once again opposed and stood up to the Jews in disclosing and expounding on their aims, and on their baseness. I’ve asked him to grant an interview to Echorouk and he has readily agreed. In his reading of the situation, Professor Faurisson foresees, in the long term, defeat for the Jews in their occupation of Palestine; those Jews will experience the fate of all invaders.
Interview conducted by Mourad Ouabass
Who are you, Robert Faurisson?
I’m about to turn 80 years of age. I was born near London in 1929 to a French father and a Scottish mother. I’m both a British subject and a French citizen. I’ve been a university professor. I taught at the Sorbonne and at a university in Lyon. I earned the agrégation (a degree obtained after the highest competitive examination) in modern and classical languages and literature (French, Latin, Greek) and hold a doctorate in literature and the social sciences (which encompass history). My two specialities have been “modern and contemporary French literature” and the “appraisal of texts and documents (literature, history, media)”. I have taken a special interest in Second World War propaganda.
Can you briefly inform Algerian readers of your research work, the aim of which has been to revise the history of what today is called “the Holocaust” of the Jews?
At the Nuremberg trial (1945-1946), a court made up of the victors of the recent war accused a vanquished Germany 1) of having ordered and planned the physical extermination of the Jews of Europe; 2) of having, to that purpose, designed, built and used weapons of mass destruction called, particularly, “gas chambers”; 3) of having, essentially with those weapons but by other means as well, caused the death of six million Jews.
How have you revised those accusations?
To back up that triple accusation, repeated for the past sixty years and more by all the big Western media, no evidence capable of withstanding serious examination has ever been produced. I’ve therefore come to the following conclusion: The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the state of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people – but not their leaders – and the Palestinian people in their entirety.
What effects have there been of your publishing the findings from your historical research, which conflict with the generally held belief in what is called “the Holocaust”?
My life became hell from the day in July 1974 when I was denounced by the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Aharonoth. From 1974 to today I have suffered ten physical assaults, I’ve had countless court cases and convictions and have ended up being deprived of the right to teach at university. In France, in order to silence the “revisionists” that we are, the Jewish lobby got a special law passed, the Fabius-Gayssot Act of July 13, 1990, modelled on an Israeli law of July 1986. Laurent Fabius is a Socialist member of parliament, extremely rich and a Jew, whilst Jean-Claude Gayssot is a Communist MP. The Fabius-Gayssot Act provides for up to a year’s imprisonment, a fine of €45,000 and still other sanctions for those who “challenge” the alleged “Holocaust”. In nearly all the Western world, with or without any special law, revisionism is severely punished. A certain number of my revisionist colleagues or friends have been or are now in prison, some for long years, especially in Germany and Austria, countries with which no [real] peace treaty has yet been signed following the end of hostilities in 1945 and whose governments remain subject to the will of the victors of the Second World War.
Has “the Holocaust” become a worldwide taboo?
In the Western world, people have the right to challenge all religions, except the religion of “the Holocaust”. One may make fun of God, Jesus, Mohamed but not of what Simon Wiesenthal, Elie Wiesel and Simone Veil have had to say about the alleged genocide or the alleged gas chambers. Auschwitz has become a holy shrine. Pilgrimages to it are organised. Visitors see the alleged relics of the alleged gassing victims: shoes, eyeglasses, hair, and steel cans that once contained Zyklon B, an insecticide presented as having been the substance used to kill the Jews whereas it was actually used for disinfecting clothing or buildings in camps ravaged by typhus epidemics. We are told that the Germans sought “the final solution of the Jewish question” in Europe and that those words concealed, apparently, their desire to exterminate the Jews. That’s false. There mustn’t be any cheating here. The Germans, in reality, sought “a final TERRITORIAL solution of the Jewish question”. They wanted to expel the Jews to a territory that would then be their own. It’s accurate to say that before the war they thought, for a time, that the territory might be in Palestine but, very quickly, they reckoned that solution would be impossible, and that it must be discarded out of consideration for “the noble and valiant Arab people” (sic! I guarantee that those were their words ).
What really happened, then?
During the war the Germans, keen to neutralise the Jews, placed a certain number of them in concentration or labour camps to wait out the conflict. They put off the definitive solution till after the war’s end. During the war, and up to the last months thereof, they said to the Allies: “You marvel at the Jews, do you? Take them, then. We’re ready to send you as many European Jews as you want but on one express condition: that they remain in Britain until the end of the war; on no pretence must they go to Palestine; the Palestinian people have already suffered so much at the hands of Jews that it would be an ‘indecency’ (sic) to add to their martyrdom”.
With that you prompt me to ask you your opinion on the massacre now going on in Gaza.
Today, more than ever, the Palestinian people are enduring an appalling plight. The Israeli army, after having inflicted on them “Operation Grapes of Wrath”, then “Operation Jenin Defensive Shield” followed by “Operation Rainbow” and “Operation Day of Repentance”, is now inflicting “Operation Cast Lead” on them. In vain! In vain for, in my view, the State of Israel will not live even as long as the Frankish kingdom of Jerusalem did, that is, 89 years. Most of the Jews there will quit those lands in the same panic as the French colonists quitting Algiers in 1962 or the American army abandoning Saigon in 1975. Palestine will become once more a free country where Moslems, Christians, Jews and others will be able to live together. At least that’s the wish I myself hold, I who for 34 years have been treated in France like a sort of Palestinian. I said this on December 11th and 12th, 2006, during the conference on “the Holocaust” organised in Tehran under the aegis of President Ahmadinejad: we all have the means to help in the liberation of Palestine. These means consist in making known to the whole world the findings of revisionist research. All credibility must be taken away from the alleged “Holocaust”, which has become the number one weapon of Zionism and the State of Israel; this lie is the sword and shield of that State. It would be absurd to try to defend against the Israelis’ military armament whilst sparing their number one worldwide propaganda weapon.
I’ve recently learnt that still another court case against you looms because of your persistence in challenging – as is forbidden in France – the reality of the Jewish “Holocaust”. When will your troubles in the law-courts ever end? After all, you’re about to reach the age of 80.
I’ll tell you now that at my next trial, of which I don’t yet know the date, I shall make the following declaration to the three judges in the 17th chamber of the Paris criminal court (2, 4 Boulevard du Palais, 75001 Paris): “Whoever allows himself to claim that the alleged Nazi gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews are a historical reality is, whether he likes it or not, giving support to a horrid lie that has become the number one war propaganda weapon of the State of Israel, a colonialist, racist and imperialist State. Let whoever has the nerve to support the ‘Holocaust’ myth look at his hands! His hands are red with the blood of Palestinian children!”
January 12, 2009
 “The Reich Government cannot lend itself to taking part in a manoeuvre that would tend to let the Jews chase the noble and valiant Arab people from their homeland, Palestine” (January 1944, in Nuremberg document NG-1794 as translated and presented by Henri Monneray, La persécution des juifs dans les pays de l’Est présentée à Nuremberg, Editions du Centre de documentation juive contemporaine, Paris 1949, p. 169).